Tuesday, May 11, 2004

NYT article about HBO Docs

Made for TV, but Shown First in a Theater
By ANNE THOMPSON

Published: May 10, 2004


ver the last 25 years, few people have done more to propel documentaries to popularity than Sheila Nevins, executive vice president of HBO and Cinemax for original programming, documentaries and family. But in nurturing and releasing films ranging from "Common Threads: Stories from the Quilt," to the 2004 Oscar nominees "My Architect," "Balseros" and "Capturing the Friedmans," Ms. Nevins has unwittingly made her job a much more difficult one.

HBO and Ms. Nevins no longer have the field pretty much to themselves, as movie studios and rival cable outlets rush to feed the audience's craving.

To adapt, Ms. Nevins has had to overhaul the way she does business. When buying a documentary, HBO, a unit of Time Warner, no longer insists that it be shown on HBO first before a lengthy release in theaters. Ms. Nevins has to spend more to acquire projects, and more to finance them. And she finds herself collaborating with theater exhibitors, a group she could once ignore.

Mark Urman, distribution president at ThinkFilm, a distributor of independent films, has witnessed the shift first-hand. Four years ago, when he worked at Lions Gate Entertainment, he called Ms. Nevins about release plans for "The Eyes of Tammy Faye," a documentary detailing the life of Tammy Faye Bakker. She did not want to talk to him. "She said, 'You open the movie, get all the attention, and when it's time for the movie to air, there's nothing left to say,' " he said.

Ms. Nevins's new thinking is on display with "The Agronomist," Jonathan Demme's portrait of a murdered Haiti activist. After ThinkFilm acquired the film, which is currently in theaters, Ms. Nevins bought the broadcast rights. This time, Mr. Urman recalled, "She said, 'We love you, you'll make noise with the movie, it has to be on HBO.' "

Last year's sleeper hit "Spellbound" is the new documentary model, a movie about real people that borrows cinematic fiction techniques. The movie about a national spelling bee took in $5.7 million in theaters before showing on HBO. "We embarked on 'Spellbound' jointly," Mr. Urman said. "We split rights, working together so that everybody got what they needed. We opened in May 2003, HBO aired in November and the video went out in January."

Traditionally, in exchange for financing a documentary feature, cable channels like HBO claimed full credit in an on-air premiere. "It used to be a hard and fast rule that you had to be on HBO first, then DVD or video," Ms. Nevins said. "The concept of going theatrical, we'd never think of. That world has changed. Now HBO is very theatrical-release friendly. Thanks to new technology there's now so much product to buy and make." But Ms. Nevins said that 50 percent of HBO's films still air there first.

While HBO is still the first financing stop for most nonfiction filmmakers, the new documentary heat wave brings with it a host of hungry competitors. More and more specialized distributors and cable channels, like Arts & Entertainment, Lifetime, Sundance and the Independent Film Channel, are jumping into the documentary fray. The reason, not surprisingly, is financial. In 1998, documentaries brought in $7.6 million at the box office, according to Nielsen EDI. Last year, the total was $49.2 million.

"I want to be in that business," said Nancy Utley, marketing president of Fox Searchlight Pictures, a top-ranked art film distributor. "The popularity of reality TV reminds us that there's nothing more fascinating than real human beings. So many movies are mining the same territory that has been mined before. Docs are fresh and give you something different."

Ms. Nevins praises Robert Redford's Sundance Film Festival for helping to raise the profile of the documentary. This past January at Sundance, distributors jostled over a spate of shock documentaries: the McDonald's fast-food exposé "Super-Size Me" was snapped up by Roadside Attractions and Showtime (not a traditional haven for documentaries); Lions Gate gave $2.5 million for worldwide rights to "Open Water," a docudrama about two scuba divers left behind in the shark-infested Caribbean; and Sony Pictures Classics paid $2 million for American rights to the surfing documentary "Riding Giants," to be released by this summer.

Several film distributors cite Michael Moore for changing the tone of what is considered acceptable by pumping his documentaries, like the Oscar-winning "Bowling for Columbine," full of entertaining, sassy attitude. Mr. Moore is seeking a new distributor for his "Fahrenheit 9/11" after the Walt Disney Company refused to allow its subsidiary, Miramax, to release the movie, which is critical of President Bush. "Fahrenheit 9/11" will make its debut this month in competition at the Cannes Film Festival. "The new documentary is populist, the story of an interesting subject, has auteur style, and doesn't follow the rules of the 60's and 70's strict documentary authority," says Tom Bernard of Sony Pictures Classics, which released "Winged Migration," an $11 million French import, last year, and financed Erroll Morris's 2004 Oscar winner, "The Fog of War."

"Sheila Nevins is the world of the past, of the Maysles brothers, Barbara Kopple and D. A. Pennebaker," he said. "Thanks to reality television, the American public is comfortable with documentary style now, and will easily travel from the TV screen to the theater."

To stay competitive, Ms. Nevins has adapted. After Andrew Jarecki's home-movie exposé "Capturing the Friedmans" made its debut at Sundance in January 2003, HBO snapped it up. Magnolia Films released the film in theaters last May. After it took in $50,000 in one week at Angelika Theater in New York, the Landmark theater chain booked it nationally on its 185 screens. (To date it has made $3 million.) The movie was released on DVD in January 2004, with the addition of a short film about one of its subjects, but will not be shown on HBO until this July. "HBO Video is part of the action," said Ms. Nevins. "We invented a piece for TV to make it viable, to give TV viewers a new element, a way to catapult them to take a new look at the film."

Ms. Nevins had always used small-scale theater releases to qualify a worthy standout, like the Spanish TV film "Balseros," for an Oscar nomination. "HBO knows how to play the Oscar release game," said Alex Gibney, a documentary producer whose films include "The Blues."

"Sheila Nevins is aware of both delivering raw meat to hungry dogs, and at the same time, knowing when a film comes along that will be an award winner," he said. "Filmmakers are interested in having their films shown theatrically. She has to decide whether that undermines what pay-channel subscribers get at HBO."

Ms. Nevins said: "Until four years ago, I wasn't in acquisitions. ThinkFilm gave me a tape of a Mongolian docudrama that looks like it was made on Mars about a camel who cries. I said to Mark, 'What, are you crazy?' It was so sweet, I wept." Ms. Nevins acquired "Story of a Weeping Camel" for HBO.

"I know how to make and market documentaries. I don't understand the business of film distribution," she said. "Now we have to make a quick decision whether it's TV or theatrical. Will it be so noisy that it will be good for HBO even after it shows in theaters, like 'Spellbound' or 'My Architect'? It's an exciting new market to be in."

Crossing the Romantic Color Line

Interesting Radio Discussion. Click/paste link below to listen w/ Audrey Edwards of Essence & Randall Kennedy.
"Interracial intimacy. White-black dating, marriage, and adoption are all on the rise in America. But opposition is strong, too. Why many African-Americans resist romances that cross the color line."

Aired: Wednesday, December 04, 2002

http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2002/12/20021204_a_main.asp

Test Your Hidden Racial Biases

(We might be able to use these tests, somehow. I think that it would be fascinating for couples to take them, and possibly families as well.)

The Implicit Association Tests from scientists at Yale and the U. of Washington, and Tolerance.org.

Have you heard about the Implicit Association Tests? These tests were developed by psychologists at Yale University and the University of Washington. They serve as a way of measuring of one's attitude (preference, stereotype or bias) about certain subjects. The suggestion is that while people are sometimes unwilling to admit to their preference on certain subjects (race included), there is also a factor that can make one unable to admit these biases. The tests are designed to break through these barriers and present the user with some insight into their "automatic preferences."

The tests are available online exclusively at Tolerance.org, a website from the Southern Poverty Law Center providing news and activism resources.

How They Work
Users are first presented with some brief preliminary information about the tests, to help you decide whether or not to take the tests. It's not as dramatic as it sounds, it merely gives you a little information about the nature of the tests and the psychologists' claims about the results.

After choosing to proceed, the user is then presented with a choice between three separate tests:
The Age Test - Determines user preference between young and old.
The Race Test - Determines user preference of black or white.
The Gender Test - Determines user gender association with liberal arts and sciences.

After selecting a test, the user is then asked to answer a set of optional demographic questions. At this point, the user is also requested to report their personal predisposition to the subject in question by selecting one of a set of multiple choice answers which encompass a range of attitudes. This is optional, but lets the researchers know what you feel your stereotypes are which can later be used as a gauge against your test results.

That done, the user, sitting in front of their Java-enabled machine, responds to a series of words and pictures relating to the test's subject using the keyboard. Each test takes a couple of minutes and the results appear at the conclusion of the tests.


The Fine Print
The researchers who designed the test warn that they "make no claim for the validity of [the] suggested interpretations" of the tests. They also point out that you may find your results "objectionable." But if you don't take the tests, how will you know?

Finally, the researchers recommend taking at least one of the tests before you do any of the background reading they have available about them on their site. I do recommend taking time to read the material, though. It's fascinating and, hey, you might learn something.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test at Tolerance.org!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whiteness Studies

A look at white privilege and whiteness studies and how they pertain to race relations.
by Kimberly Hohman from the Race Relations Newsletter
(Kimberly is the author of The Colors of Love: The Black Person's Guide to Interracial Relationships. She has been in an interracial marriage for 10 years, and would be considered "biracial." I think that she'd be a great subject & have her email: racerelations.guide@about.com )

The Issue:
White privilege has been defined as a package of benefits, granted to people in our society who have white skin, which allows them certain free passes to certain things in our society that are not easily available to people of color. Things like, but certainly not limited to:

-Being able to turn on the television and see people of their race widely represented.
-Never being asked to speak on behalf of their entire race.
-Being able to succeed without being called a credit to their race.
-Being able to have a bad day without wondering what their race had to do with specific negative incidents.

Being able to have a bad day without wondering what their race had to do with specific negative incidents.
Despite common assumptions, the studies of whiteness are not based in racism or white supremacy. Whiteness studies are scholarly examinations if the issues surrounding white privilege as well as a look into the role whiteness and white culture play in an increasingly multicultural society.

Background & History: According to Roberto Rodriguez, in a publication for Black Issues in Higher Education, the emergence of whiteness studies can be traced back to the late 1980s; specifically to an article by Richard Dyer appearing in Screen, a British film magazine.

Since then, whiteness has been explored in articles, publications and college courses in an effort to learn "how Whites define race, and how they view racism and White privilege" and "how Whites view themselves and others, to how Whites view themselves in relation to people of color, to how they define Whiteness," according to Rodriguez.

Essays on White Privilege:
Peggy McIntosh - "Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack"
Robert Jensen - "White Privilege Shapes the U.S."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your Voices
"I'm a 34 year old white male born in a nice middle class home. I may be the most hated stereotype among minorities as I truly do experience 'white privilege' in the business world. I try to put myself in various positions of experiencing life as a minority in America and outside such as trips to India and Korea. I still struggle to experience such feelings. However, while working in previous jobs dedicated to the poor sections of larger cities (Durham, Las Vegas, Charlotte), I have been able to feel that uncomfortable feeling at times when I was viewed rather negatively. Not a good feeling but one that is needed."

Read more of this story and share your own: http://racerelations.about.com/library/blreallife032201c.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whiteness Studies Courses: These controversial, relatively new courses that are cropping up across the country are aimed at exploring what it means to be white in today's society and how 'whiteness' effects race relations and multiculturalism. According to an NPR All Things Considered report, while scholars are split on the study of white culture or 'whiteness', they do tend to agree that "whiteness conveys privilege so pervasive that it's virtually invisible to its beneficiaries. And this, says scholars, is the 'racial problem' that white people must confront."

The courses are largely taught by white professors lending what some believe is a certain amount of credibility to courses which have been accused of being unscholarly.

Whiteness studies are becoming increasingly accepted as an important party of the total study of ethnicity in today's higher education classrooms.

"I think critical White studies is a very important and critical part of new directions in ethnic studies," said Dr. Evelyn HuDehart, a professor of ethnic studies at the University of Colorado-Boulder.

The following is a sampling of available Whiteness Studies courses:
Critical Perspectives on Whiteness Brown University
The Social Construction of Race The University of Arizona
Critical Whiteness: Gender, Rhetoric and Pedagogy in "Whiteness Studies" The City University of New York
Seminar in Modern Literature: Deconstructing Whiteness The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Whiteness and Racial Difference Swarthmore College
Theorizing Whiteness Purdue University

For further information on white privilege and whiteness studies: http://racerelations.about.com/library/weekly/aa060200a.htm?once=true&